The Power of Charts
Labels: data visualization
I now await the TV appearances of Sarah Palin with the same anticipation and laugh-readiness as I do for Rick Gervais or (late) Mitch Hedberg: "This is going to be funny". I recommend reading George Saunders' essay in the New York, My Gal, one time and a half: it's funnier when you read her real words in the introduction again and realize that she speaks the way he wrote his text. I guess Saturday Night Live did it best when they simpled quoted her - it IS comedy material.
Labels: politics
This has been evident to me for a long time. Biology plays a big part in one's political opinion. I wouldn't go as far as to say that it's always decided from the start, as events can make a person change his mind (and biology). But opinions certainly run into people's veins as much as in their brain.
Labels: neuroscience
I was just thinking lately: Darn, I wish I had a blog to talk about the election!
Never ever ever write personal stuff in an email sent from your work account.
Labels: email
"The lesson for the next U.S. president: raise the taxes on fuel. A lot."
Teenagers are a pain in the neck, aren't they? They should learn to behave, they should control their tantrums, they should get a grip.
Labels: neuroscience
The second installment on this new series called: "We're all vegetal", here's on my evidence that hormones in our brains control us. First, it makes us socially awkward. Now, it makes us believe in God:
(...) religious belief is an outgrowth of brain architecture that evolved during early human history.What if we're programmed to believe in God, does that mean that God exists or not? Certainly not a point for Him.
Labels: neuroscience